SmartWorks Network

  • Home
  • RSS Blog
  • YouTube channels
  • Podcasts
  • Jobs
  • Tools
  • About us
  • Contact

ARCrypt Ransomware Evolves with Multiple TOR Communication Channels

by Valentin / Saturday, 13 January 2024 / Published in RSS blog posts

Cyber Security BlogsRansomware Operators Thrive in the Shadows

ARCrypter ransomware, also known as ChileLocker, emerged in August 2022 and gained attention following an attack on an entity located in Chile. Subsequently, researchers revealed that this ransomware started targeting organizations worldwide. The Threat Actors (TA)s responsible for this group do not maintain a leak site for extorting their victims. It has been observed that ARCrypter ransomware targets both Windows and Linux operating systems.

In early 2023, researchers reported the emergence of a new Linux variant of ARCrypter, developed using the GO programming language. Cyble Research and Intelligence Labs (CRIL) also discovered an updated version of the ARCrypt Windows executable, which previously existed in the wild.

This version of ARCrypt ransomware has been observed in the wild for approximately 2-3 months. During our investigation, we discovered some unusual techniques employed by the TA to interact with their victims.

In contrast to the older variant of ARCrypt ransomware, which utilized a common chat site hosted on Tor for all victims, we analyzed multiple binaries of the updated version and identified the following:

The ransom note of each binary was pointing to a mirror site

The TA created dedicated chat sites hosted on Tor for each victim

In one instance, the ransom note instructed the victim to contact the TA via TOX, a messaging platform, by creating a profile with a specific username

Apart from this, we also found an instance shown in the figure below, where TA offered the victim a discount if the ransom was paid in Monero. Tracing transactions is difficult in Monero compared to Bitcoin, so some TAs prefer to use this. We have also observed AvosLocker ransomware in the past seeking ransom payments in Monero with added discounts.

Figure 1 – TA Offering Discount for Monero Transaction

This ransomware variant now utilizes the “.crYpt” instead of the “.crypt” extension to rename the encrypted filename and consists of a new ransom note. In this blog, we will further explore the changes observed in the ransomware binary and the communication method used by the threat actor (TA).

Analysis Communication Method

During our analysis of multiple binaries of the ARCrypt ransomware, we discovered that each ransom note in the binaries directed victims to different Tor sites for communication, as highlighted in Figure below. Further investigation revealed that these sites were mirror sites, sharing the same user interface but having different URLs. Typically, ransomware TAs include all the mirror sites in the ransom note to ensure accessibility for victims. This approach allows victims to access an alternative site if one becomes inaccessible.

Figure 2 – Ransom Notes

We conducted tests using login credentials obtained from various ransom notes, regardless of the associated Tor site mentioned in each note. However, these login credentials failed to authenticate on the Tor sites. This indicates that the provided login credentials are specific to the corresponding Tor site mentioned in the ransom note, further confirming that the threat actor (TA) creates dedicated Tor sites for each victim. Additionally, we observed that the Tor sites mentioned in older ransom notes were no longer accessible, suggesting that TA might be intentionally removing traces to clear their footprints.

The figure below shows the ARCrypt ransomware tor site.

Figure 3 – Tor Site

We also encountered an instance where the TA was urging its victim to create a profile on TOX with a specific username, as shown in the figure below. This highlights that the TA might be carrying out targeted attacks.

Figure 4 – Urging Victim to Create a Specific TOX Profile

ARCrypt ransomware binary (SHA256: 4f2e40e6353a2430a80824d113268b5cdb28a0ddb079418be05ba79dea608410) is a 64-bit executable.

The figure below shows the file details.

Figure 5 – File DetailsExecution

Upon execution, the ransomware copies itself to the %TEMP% directory and assigns a random six-character alphanumeric string comprised of uppercase letters [A-Z] and digits [0-9] as its filename. It then proceeds to run from this location and deletes the original ransomware binary using the command “cmd /c DEL “%SAMPLEPATH%” &EXIT”. A batch script was employed in earlier versions to remove the initial executable file.

The figure below illustrates the portion of the ransomware responsible for self-deletion.

Figure 6 – Deleting Itself

The updated variant of ARCrypt ransomware has the ability to terminate processes and disable specific services, including those related to anti-malware, backup, and recovery. This behavior suggests that the ransomware might be targeting servers.

zhudongfangyu

QBFCService

BackupExecAgentBrowser

YooIT

QBCFMonitorService

BackupExecAgentAccelerator

  YooBackup

PDVFSService

AcronisAgent

VSNAPVSS

Intuit.QuickBooks.FCS

mepocs

VeeamTransportSvc

DefWatch

memtas

VeeamNFSSvc

ccSetMgr

backup

VeeamDeploymentService

ccEvtMgr

AcrSchSvc

veeam

CAARCUpdateSvc

GxVss

stc_raw_agent

BackupExecVSSProvider

GxFWD

sophos

BackupExecRPCService

GxCVD

SavRoam

BackupExecManagementService

GxCIMgr

RTVscan

BackupExecJobEngine

GxBlr

QBIDPService

BackupExecDiveciMediaService

CASADDWebSvc

The ransomware terminates the following processes. Due to the resource-intensive nature of the encryption process, the ransomware executables often terminate processes to free up system resources and accelerate the encryption process. It also terminates a few Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions as a means to evade detection.

sql.exe

epam_svc.exe

mspub.exe

oracle.exe

EPWD.exe

onenote.exe

ocssd.exe

Compliance.exe

outlook.exe

dbsnmp.exe

cpda.exe

powerpnt.exe

synctime.exe

cptrayLogic.exe

steam.exe

agntsvc.exe

cptrayUI.exe

thebat.exe

ocautoupds.exe

TESvc.exe

thunderbird.exe

encsvc.exe

RemediationService.exe

visio.exe

firefox.exe

IDAFServerHostService.exe

winword.exe

tbirdconfig.exe

dbeng50.exe

wordpad.exe

mydesktopqos.exe

sqbcoreservice.exe

notepad.exe

ocomm.exe

excel.exe

isqlplussvc.exe

EFRService.exe

infopath.exe

xfssvccon.exe

epab_svc.exe

msaccess.exe

mydesktopservice.exe

The figure below shows the process tree.

Figure 7 – Process TreeArtifacts

This ransomware uses RegCreateKeyA API to open registry keys under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE and uses RegSetValueExA API to set values for a specific key. The values being set to include “legalnoticecaption”, and “legalnoticetext” in the Key “HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESOFTWAREMicrosoftWindowsCurrentVersionPoliciesSystem”.

The following data is added to the values:

legalnoticecaption: ALL YOUR FILES HAS BEEN ENCRYPTED!

Legalnoticetext: For unlock your files follow the instructions from the readme_for_unlock.txt

It modifies this registry key to show a message during system startup.

The figure below shows the code for altering the registry keys.

Figure 8 – Altering Registry

The figure below shows the message displayed by the ransomware binary.

Figure 9 – Pops Up Message

This ransomware variant renames the encrypted files with the extension “.crYpt”, whereas the older variant used the “.crypt” extension.

The figure below shows the encrypted files.

Figure 10 – Encrypted FilesRansom Note

This variant of ARCrypt ransomware introduces a distinct ransom note that bears only a few similarities to the older ransom note.

The figure below illustrates the comparison between the older and new ransom note.

Figure 11 – Ransom Note ComparisonConclusion

The ARCrypt ransomware has evolved with an updated variant that incorporates certain changes. We believe the TA behind the ARCrypt ransomware is trying to avoid attracting unwanted attention. By updating the ransomware binary and adopting certain practices such as preferring ransom payments in Monero, not extorting victims through leak sites, and utilizing a new communication medium for each victim, the attacker aims to enhance their level of anonymity.

Our Recommendations  

We have listed some of the essential cybersecurity best practices that create the first line of control against attackers. We recommend that our readers follow the best practices given below:  

Safety Measures Needed to Prevent Ransomware Attacks  

Conduct regular backup practices and keep those backups offline or in a separate network  

Turn on the automatic software update feature on your computer, mobile, and other connected devices wherever possible and pragmatic  

Use a reputed anti-virus and Internet security software package on your connected devices, including PC, laptop, and mobile

Refrain from opening untrusted links and email attachments without verifying their authenticity  

Users Should Take the Following Steps After the Ransomware Attack  

Detach infected devices on the same network  

Disconnect external storage devices if connected 

Inspect system logs for suspicious events  

Impact And Cruciality of Ransomware  

Loss of valuable data

Loss of the organization’s reputation and integrity

Loss of the organization’s sensitive business information 

Disruption in organization operation  

Financial loss

MITRE ATT&CK® Techniques  

Tactic  

Technique ID  

Technique..

​Read More

  • Tweet

About Valentin

What you can read next

Over 178,000 SonicWall firewalls still vulnerable to old flaws
Windows SmartScreen bug exploited to deliver powerful info-stealer (CVE-2023-36025)
Less Is More: Why MSPs Are Moving to the Cybersecurity Platform Model

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Sniffnet: Free, open-source network monitoring
  • 90% of threats are social engineering
  • 78% of SMBs fear cyberattacks could shut down their business
  • Chinese attackers leverage previously unseen malware for espionage
  • Long-running Chinese cyberespionage operation targeted Southeast Asian government

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Recent Posts

  • Sniffnet: Free, open-source network monitoring

    Cyber Security Blogs Sniffnet is a free, open-s...
  • 90% of threats are social engineering

    Cyber Security Blogs In this Help Net Security ...
  • 78% of SMBs fear cyberattacks could shut down their business

    Cyber Security Blogs 94% of SMBs have experienc...
  • Chinese attackers leverage previously unseen malware for espionage

    Cyber Security Blogs Sophos released its report...
  • Long-running Chinese cyberespionage operation targeted Southeast Asian government

    Cyber Security Blogs Researchers have uncovered...

Archives

  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • March 2024
  • January 2024

Categories

  • RSS blog posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Recent Comments

    Featured Posts

    • Sniffnet: Free, open-source network monitoring

      0 comments
    • 90% of threats are social engineering

      0 comments
    • 78% of SMBs fear cyberattacks could shut down their business

      0 comments
    • Chinese attackers leverage previously unseen malware for espionage

      0 comments
    • Long-running Chinese cyberespionage operation targeted Southeast Asian government

      0 comments

    SEARCH

    RECENT POSTS

    • Sniffnet: Free, open-source network monitoring

    • 90% of threats are social engineering

    • 78% of SMBs fear cyberattacks could shut down their business

    TAG CLOUD

    ©2024 All rights Reserved @Smart Works Network

    TOP